Crash test dummies
Crash test dummies
Anne B. Butterfield
November 16, 2008 (Daily Camera)
On Nov. 4, we the people threw off the chains of our racist past by electing Barack Obama. It's good to kick off an evil master -- but it's imperative to note that in this election we gave up racism more easily than our obedience to big oil and other big shots in the drama of crony capitalism. We've been flailed around like crash test dummies, asked to do what big oil and gas and the big three auto companies tell us.
Consider a few voter issues:
Last week Coloradans obeyed the $11 million ad campaign put forth by oil and gas companies to defeat Amendment 58, a measure in which our severance tax on oil and gas would no longer be offset by credits on property taxes. It was assailed by claims that the tax would be passed "straight through" to grocery bills and prices at the pump. It was never true. And in the off-chance that wholesale market would allow the small cost to bleed through to retail, the cost would have been well spent leveraging our soon-to-end fossil fuel economy toward a new clean energy economy. It went down by a 16 percent margin.
We were warned -- in a Camera opinion by former Boulderite and renowned oil researcher Antonia Juhasz, writing about California's Prop 87. Offered just two years ago, Prop 87 aimed to impose a small fee per barrel of oil drilled within that state and direct the funds to investments in alternative energy. Starting with a strong popular advantage, it lost by a 10 percent margin after a $100 million campaign funded by Big Oil.
How did our nation's most assertively green state succumb to the snake oil of Prop 87?
Happily, 24 months later, California saw through a ruse presented by T. Boone Pickens in Proposition 10 that would have made California sell bonds to subsidize the sale of cars and trucks powered by natural gas, a fossil fuel produced by a Pickens company. Pickens has been good at promoting wind energy and even scoffing at more drilling for oil, but Prop 10 nonetheless aimed to shift our automotive sector from dependence on one declining fossil fuel to another. Electrification of transportation continues to be the best move, especially for freight which needs to be reborn on a refurbished rail system.
Barack Obama has been reminding us that power never gives up without a fight, which we can see in these fights put up by fossil fuel interests. Recently also, the Big Three automakers have wielded their power in a way that begs new terms to describe stupidity. Denying the obvious signs that peak oil is upon us, the Big Three have perversely continued to badger Congress and the White House against higher CAFE standards, even litigating against states' clean car mandates. The money spent could have gone to innovation. General Motor could be profitable now had it not killed its popular electric car program in California in 2003. Instead, it is going belly up because suburbanites no longer want Suburbans.
We can't blame the United Auto Workers. In a poll in 2002, 80 percent of UAW households blew off industry fumes about higher CAFE standards costing jobs and adding hundreds to the price of cars. Most Michiganders and 84 percent of UAW households favored a new average standard of 40 miles per gallon by 2012. Why did elected officials crony up to big Auto and let Michigan and the whole nation down?
We the people have awakened to the benefits of a new energy economy, with virtually all Democrats, three-quarters of independents and 58 percent of Republicans indicating in a new Zogby poll that clean energy is important to lifting the nation's economy. Yet we are waiting for our leaders to do the right thing with the automakers' crisis and the climate crisis; we are even waiting for ourselves to get the courage to tax Big Oil so we can fund our future. It's time to tell these industries, "You're not the boss of me."
<< Home